Remember, if you get into these discussions, you are submitting to “their” court and “their” rules (statutes). These 2 questions are for a legitimate court situation, which is not available now, except for in the High Court … hmmm ... Maybe. Stick to your guns and your hard copy of Clause 5.

1 - Who is my accuser ?

If it is the State Govt., Local Council, or anyone except a flesh and blood person, there is no case.

If the opposing solicitor says he is representing the State, etc, then demand your right to cross examine that accuser. Naturally, this cannot happen because the “accuser” is a CORPORATION (always in capital letters) which is dead, inert and cannot speak. A solicitor cannot accuse you nor testify against you, he can only present facts and hard evidence. A photo of your car does not prove any speed. A camera is not a witness, you cannot cross examine a camera.
 

A policeman is now an employee of a private corporation.  His testimony is his admission of his assault against you. If you know any police, let them know that they too are victims of the fraud and are personally liable for their actions. In fact, some American police (and other Corporation staff) are now being told to shift their assets aside to avoid bankruptcy as people wake up to what's going on and start charging them for assault. Many Local Council staff act like wannabe police – do what you must. They are your accuser, not the Council. You do not have to accept a Council staff Solicitor defending them. Why? The solicitor has sworn allegiance to the court and the system - not the client.

 

 

2 - Who is the victim ?

No victim = No crime    (in any situation.)

Deuteronomy, Chapter 4  Verse 2:

You shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall you diminish anything from it, that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.