Larry Hannigan’s Australia

This all stems from the council making a purposeful decision to breach the law. Luckily for the RUMBLES they knew their Common Law well - (do you ?) .-

No Local Government ACT in any Australian State has ever received Royal Assent - thus they are ALL invalid and worthless.

This matter is as yet not mentioned in law reports and will probably remain so, lest Percy Public get wind of it, so please don't harass the Rumbles - It will be soon spread far and wide across the internet for all to see the corruption in Local Councils, pretending to be "government".- they are employees of Private Companies whose goal is revenue by any means. Put THEM on full notice of the coming action against them for their failure to comply with lawful legislation and attempting to impose invalid legislation upon myself. Their Ignorance of the Law is NO Excuse.

The Council Officers, the Environmental Officer. Two members of the NSW police FORCE and two private tow truck operators may all face charges for failing to follow the lawful procedure.

The matter  very much alive and the prosecuting attorney is keeping all close to his chest..

For a greater understanding of the implications of this event - see
http://www.larryhannigan.com/whatact.htm

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1993
 is invalid and worthless

RUMBLE v LIVERPOOL PLAINS COUNCIL

Rumble-v-Liverpool Plains Shire Council & Others District Court proceedings    No. 2011/58125

To whom it may concern

On the 13th and 14th August 2009,  Local Council officers and rangers and two local police officers attended our property and handed to us a local council order to enter our property and remove vehicles that were on our property inside our boundary
 
We refused to allow access to the council officers and police so they cut the lock off our gate. After us showing them we have a NO ENTRY sign on the gates of our property, the police told us we had no choice but to let them in. As we said, "where was the court order to say we had broken the law", there was not one. We have a solicitor in Sydney and a barrister who are handling the case but we have not attended to court as yet, we have been told by lawyers that we will be going into the district court in Sydney in the Common Law division on the 21st May this year to have our case heard .
 
Our vehicles were removed by the council with the aid of local tilt tray operators and placed in what council called a secure area until the matter can be sorted. Our vehicles were placed in a paddock (council secure compound - consisting of normal rural wire one end) and on the second day of being there, our vehicles were vandalised with windows and lights smashed and parts removed from them , and yes it is still happening as our cars are still there, not back on our property .
 
Whilst they took 56 vehicles, they allowed for 22 to remain on the property, and yes, their so called "order" was to remove all unregistered vehicles from the property, so why leave 22 ?  Does this not go against their council order or was it because we were telling them that they had no authority to enter our land and that they were breaking the law?

Lee Rumble    30 Jan 2012

Federal Government  |  State Government  |  Local Council

Item 01: Local Government Act 1993 is Worthless

Item 02: Council Validity

Item 03: Council Land Resumptions

Item 04: Council Rates/Taxes are Illegal - Part 1
             Council Rates/Taxes are Illegal - Part 2

Item 05: Have You Received a Summons?

Item 06: Councils and the Constitution

Item 07: Parking Ticket Signs and Response Letter